You have got to love the raw enthusiasm of our new Springbok coach in suggesting that we will see three South African sides in the Super 14 semi-finals this year.
Tank Lanning writes for News24 that if he really believes that, I want a lot of what he has been smoking on his trips round the country to visit the respective franchises…
To my mind, we are more likely to see two sides fighting to stay out of the basement of the log, one side hoping for a position on the correct side of the mid-table morass, and the other two scrambling for a semi-final spot.
The loss of players by the various SA franchises has been well documented so I will not dwell on that, but for a side that came 11th last year to lose players like Os du Randt, Jannie du Plessis, Ronnie Cooke, Marius Joubert and Willem de Waal, along with their coach, Rassie Erasmus, the Cheetahs are going to be seriously up against it this year. In fact, anything above 13th or 14th on the log has to be seen as a success.
Do not have the depth
Casting an eye over a Lions squad that is missing Andre Pretorius and has a youngster who struggled to make the UCT Under-20 side just a few years back in place of the powerful tighthead prop, Brian Mujati, and one is again forced to wonder how clever the decision was to have a fifth South African franchise in the competition.
We actually just do not have the depth to support a fifth franchise.
Having four relatively competitive franchises in which we actually recognised all the names in the squads would be so much better for SA rugby. Thirty less players to pay hopelessly inflated salaries for one, but given that only 22 can play for the Boks, and as a nation we are judged on how those players do every four years at the Rugby World Cup, what is the point of having 150 players contracted every year?
Exciting franchise
One argument could be about casting the talent net as wide as possible, but that holds no water given that our problem lies in the fact that we lose our talented players after school or age group rugby. That net needs to go deeper rather than wider, and new competitions such as the Varsity Cup which starts on Monday next week are the way forward in terms of retaining talented rugby players.
We need to create “reverse funnels”, if you like, where systems are put in place that enable the rugby fraternity to have a look at all exciting young players coming out of school and age group rugby, and then funnelled upwards toward the Super 14. Not another Super 14 franchise where journeymen players like Johann Ackermann are put on standby.
The Stormers are again potentially a very exciting franchise on paper, and with Brian Mujati and Adriaan Fondse amongst the squad, the money spenders have at least attempted to plug what has been a gap for a number of years now – the tight five. But just one injury at the back, to Conrad Jantjes, sees the fabulously exciting, but hopelessly tiny (at this level), Gio Aplon in the mix. So a general lack of depth, and confidence, given the performances in previous years, will see them lose a few games they should have won, and have them finish in mid-table.
Ideal man
So again, I believe, it will be down to the Sharks and Bulls to fly the SA flag.
Frederic Michalak has stated, amazingly, that French rugby was becoming a little stifling for his creativity, so he has chosen the Super 14, and in particular, the Sharks, as the place to ply his trade. It could come amazingly unstuck, but given that he will have the likes of Kees Lensing, Bismarck and Jannie du Plessis forming the platform up front, he could just be the ideal man to unleash the likes of JP Pietersen and Frans Steyn…
Sure the Bulls have lost their lineout kingpin, but in Bakkies Botha, provided he is not too grumpy about not being released from his contract, and Danie Rossouw, you might actually have two locks better suited to the new rules. Given the increase in free-kicks, in place of full penalties, we should see fewer lineouts awarded, and lock forwards good with ball in hand, could be the new flavour.
Someone as capable
They have, amazingly, not been a strong scrummaging side for a while, but have always been able to hold their own, and if the likes of Pedrie Wannenburg, Wikus van Heerden and Pierre Spies can play enough games, they will be able to get the monumentally dangerous Fourie du Preez and Bryan Habana into the action.
But it will be a different, and fairer, playing field this year with the All Blacks back in the competition. Yes, they have also lost a large number of players to the UK, but unlike us, and using the Pacific Islanders at will, they seem always to be able to replace the great players with someone as capable or exciting. So I think we will be back to a tournament dominated by the Crusaders, Blues and Hurricanes.





February 12th, 2008 at 12:01 pm
Please don’t forget about the influence of the coaches – or lack therof.
2007 for the Bulls saw a very innovative Todd Louden and HM at the helm. This year is a different matter.
If they can survive this transition, then by all means, a place in the semis is indeed on.
February 12th, 2008 at 2:04 pm
Vriende die waraths span is uit
February 12th, 2008 at 3:52 pm
Cab,
One for you:
I’m desperately seeking a full version but this snippet for now:
http://www.twistednerve.co.uk/b-music/audio/yamasuki_07.mp3
You can get more info and reviews at:
http://www.amazon.com/Yamasuki-Singers-Monde-Fabuleux/dp/B0007XTOI4
A slightly longer version of the song at [run down to where they say “play track 7″:
http://www.moviegrooves.com/shop/lemondefabuleuxdesyamasuki.htm
February 12th, 2008 at 5:00 pm
In my opinion, there will not be a single SA team in the semis.
We ARE going to suffer a RWC hangover.
As per usual, the Sharks will be most competitive, followed closely by the Bulls.
The other three will be canon fodder.
February 12th, 2008 at 5:04 pm
cheers Ras, will have a listen later.
agree on your rugby outlook for ’08, but think the stormers might just surprise, then again, maybe not.
February 12th, 2008 at 5:45 pm
Also Cabster,
Indigo Girls-Closer To Fine
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RY1Bl4nfpdA
February 12th, 2008 at 5:47 pm
“I went to see the Doctor of Phillosphy,
With a poster of Rasputin”
Sound Doc that!
February 12th, 2008 at 5:48 pm
and why is the mad monk rasputin such a hero of yours?
February 12th, 2008 at 5:56 pm
and why is the mad monk rasputin such a hero of yours?
Comment by cab — February 12, 2008 @ 5:48 pm |Edit This
Penetrating question, Cab.
Not sure really.
One of amongst a great many reasons:
Lover of the Russian Queen.
Possessor of the most legendary piece of tackle in the world.
Indestructable.
A complete charlatan.
An extraordinary man to have carried off his huge deceipt.
And lastly, the most magnificent pair of mad eyes I’ve ever seen and a beard that has no match.
But, between you and me, ever so private like, it’s the winky that caught my attention!
February 12th, 2008 at 5:58 pm
lol, fair enough.
February 12th, 2008 at 6:14 pm
Comment by Rasputin — February 12, 2008 @ 5:45 pm |Edit This
Cab is a lesbian?
Boys trousers, construction boots, unshaven armpits and check lumber jacket shirts?
Eeeeewwwwww!!!!
February 12th, 2008 at 6:17 pm
By the way I think the assessment is off
Sharks to challenge for an away semi spot
Bulls upper half of log – just
Stormers – top side of the bottom half
Lions and Cheetahs in a battle royale with Reds and Waratahs for the wooden spoon.
February 12th, 2008 at 6:40 pm
DavidS,
not looking good for the lions with ernst joubert now out hey?
what i dont get is why they keep selling players like habana, januarie, jantjies, mujati, willemse and cronje.
if loffie could at least keep the players for a couple of years, he could get something together.
February 12th, 2008 at 6:59 pm
They didn’t want to sell Mujati – remember they tried their damn best to keep him. Same with Habana.
Willemse was not a good investment and neither was Solly T
But remember the Lions are running on empty insofar as resources are concerned
February 13th, 2008 at 1:12 am
Comment by Rasputin — February 12, 2008 @ 5:45 pm |Edit This
Hard to believe this was back in 1989. Great voices.
February 13th, 2008 at 7:03 pm
I think for the first 5 games or so, the teams with the fittest forwards will dominate…..there is a helluva lot of running under the new rules…….even getting on side at breakdowns will be hard work, as you are not allowed to play the ball until you get back your 5 metres. Just think picking yourself up off the ground after a punishing tackle, and having to run back into position so you don’t let your team mates down…Jeeeeeeeeeez it’s going to be hard yacka !
Patrick.
February 13th, 2008 at 7:10 pm
Patrick
That’s why I think what will eventually happen is that defenders will be instructed by their coaches NOT to join rucks unless they are absolutely sure of being able to win the ball back.
The risks of conceding a line break are so great that the priority will be to create an inpenetrable defensive wall of all 15 players, and that can only be achieved by defenders staying out of the rucks unless they really have to get involved. I think that will ruin the game as a spectacle even though the ball will theoretically be in play much longer.
It’s the thin end of the rugby league wedge: except in rugby league you have to give up the ball after a certain number of tackles.
February 13th, 2008 at 8:17 pm
Il Postino
The way you describe it sounds more like the fat edge of the union of league and union
Doesn’t sound nice at all