Lions brand losing it

June 28, 2009
Posted by Boertjie

IT WILL no doubt seem cruel to serve up this statistic after what was an epic game of rugby on Saturday but the Lions have now lost seven Test matches on the trot.
Indisputably, the complexity of modern rugby works against the Lions’ concept.

Paul Ackford, London Telegraph

And given the Lions’ casualty rate, there is every prospect of that sequence stretching to eight after the final Test in Johannesburg.

Lions supporters, and there are many, who crow about the commercial viability of the brand and the fact it attracts fans in their tens of thousands to various host countries, ignore the essence of sporting reality.

The Lions must be competitive on the pitch to retain their allure and they are not. Gallant losers, no matter how brave or committed, are still losers.

Indisputably, the complexity of modern rugby works against the Lions’ concept. To merge four nations with four separate identities, cultures and playing styles is virtually impossible. National coaches are granted a season before judgment is passed on their methodology.

This squad effectively had four weeks’ grace before they were expected to emerge fully formed and ready for battle.

It was ludicrous to agree to two Tests at altitude. The Lions faded badly in the thin Pretoria air. And denying the Lions the chance to test themselves against South Africa’s best players in the warm-up games only created a false sense of optimism, an unrealistic assessment of the Lions’ skills.

If the Lions are just about fans having great holidays with rugby as a backdrop, then they are not worth taking seriously any longer.

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook Post to MySpace

6 Comments

  1. JT_BOKBEFOK! JT - www.rugby-innsbruck.at says:
    June 28th, 2009 at 6:41 pm Reply to this comment

    BS! Apart from the WC the Lions is the best thing in rugby! Mainly because it is only every 4 years

  2. Boertjie Boertjie says:
    June 28th, 2009 at 8:25 pm Reply to this comment

    Reply to JT – http://www.rugby-innsbruck.at @ 6:41 pm:

    Not if they keep getting their arses
    handed to them on a plate.
    Tour in 2005 in NZ was a 0-3 disaster,
    2001 in OZ 1-2.

  3. Boertjie Boertjie says:
    June 28th, 2009 at 8:27 pm Reply to this comment

    Reply to Boertjie @ 8:25 pm:

    Mind you, they bring in a lot
    of money, also via the touring
    Poms. And sport = money.

  4. bok_in_oz bryce_in_oz says:
    June 29th, 2009 at 7:31 am Reply to this comment

    7 ‘away’ games on the trot against three teams that have/had been together for almost 4 yrs…

  5. philipdc philipdc says:
    June 29th, 2009 at 6:03 pm Reply to this comment

    I think you guys miss the point. It is that in the modern games it takes a long time and a deep squad to make an unassailable systems. This problem has long been seen in Barbarian Games.

    I would take it further to say that even International games suffer this. Sure the Best Rugby Side in the World right now is the Bulls? (Choke)

  6. Boertjie Boertjie says:
    June 29th, 2009 at 6:53 pm Reply to this comment

    Reply to philipdc @ 6:03 pm:

    Good points.

    That is also why I feel we have
    missed a great opportunity to
    really humiliate this team in
    the mode of 2005.