No spinning, just the exact transcript of the press conference in which Peter de Villiers took on the (largely) British Media contingent.
Planet Rugby
Q: Eye gouging is on the increase throughout the rugby world, what is your view on it?
PDV: I’m against anything that is not in the spirit of the game. Anything! We won’t go to the lows of not being negative in such a positive game we have. We’ve got brilliant players in this country, they are world class – most of them. To try and even compare them to little small things that belong outside in the bushveld…(pause for thought). If we want to go eye-gouge any lion, we go out to the bushveld like we normally do, eye-gouge them and see if we can outrun them or see if they haul us in. We will never NEVER encourage anybody to be part of negative play or bring the game into respute. Schalk’s nature and character, if you know the man as I know him, is that he won’t ever (eye-gouge). He’s too physical, I think he’s more physical than any other rugby player in the world! To go to those kind of measures to show he’s the boss on the rugby field… he will never ever do it. And I don’t think he did it. Eye-gouging, biting, head-butting and high-tackling is something we as a team, especially me, will not stand for. We want to promote this game amongst our youth and amongst everybody to see how passionate we are about this game. We want to bring that passion above anything else in our country. We want this game to be the biggest national-building tool that we ever can be. But by encouraging stuff like that (foul play), we are fighting a lost cause. And if that happens, then I shouldn’t even be here. I will never ever be part of doing anything like that.
Q: Do you think longer bans on foul play will discourage players and coaches from implementing these acts?
PDV: I’m part of this lovely game and I’m very honoured to be part of this lovely game. And there are some things I will enhance whilst I am part of this lovely game. Negativity is not one them. I don’t make the laws, I don’t write the books about sentences, I only abide by them. I don’t appoint judicial officers, and I don’t always agree with them. But again, I’m part of the system, and if you can’t work within the system,and you want to have your own system – then you creating your own world. There are a lot of things that I don’t like in life, but as long as I am part of this world, I have to adjust to make it work.
(Four journalists throw in questions at the same time, which doesn’t go down well with De Villiers)
PDV: You can’t ask questions at once. One at a time! I mean like…
(Silence)
Q: You don’t think Schalk did it? Have you not watched the television footage?
PDV: I’m telling you, I watched the TV footage and I’m not saying anything otherwise I will go against everything we decided as a team. I watched the TV footage and I am still convinced there was nothing that he did on purpose. For Schalk himself when he watched it, he was like (imitating Burger): ‘Oh my!’. But he never meant to go to anybody’s eye. And I will stand by what I said, we will wait until we got the report and then we can make a great report back to you guys.
Q: If you don’t think he did it, then how come his fingers made contact with Luke Fitzgerald’s eye?
PDV (raising his voice): Some of us have got a hearing problem! I said, that we stand us a group with what the team said. We are waiting for the report. And if the report BY ANY MEANS comes out and says “Schalk Burger is guilty of eye-gouging”, then we just have to abide by that. But I believe it won’t be the case and we stand by that.
Q: What do you think he’s banned for eight weeks for then Peter?
PDV (becoming visually uncomfortable, raising his voice once more and speaking as if to a three year old): We …are …waiting… for… the… report! And then, I can answer your question. I can’t give you any answer without the report.
Q (same journalist): It sounds to me like you are ducking the issue?
PDV (looking shell-shocked): I’m not ducking the issue. It’s just the I’m working within the system. I’m not like you (the media), who have no systems! You can word whatever you want to word. We are working in a system where we wait until the report has been tabled… then we will react.
Q (confusion amongst the media): Did you not have any representatives at the hearing to report back to you following Burger’s disciplinary?
PDV (again, stretching his words): We are waiting for the report to be tabled so that we can disect the whole thing. We will then come back to you with an INformed answer, and then we won’t MISunderstand each other again.
(At this time the South African media manager tries to calm down the situation by saying he will be sending out a response from the Bok management following their ‘report’)
Q: You said after the game that the incident did not deserve a yellow card. Do you now in hindsight regret saying that and believe it was worth a card?
PDV: Let me tell you something. Look at the footage properly. When you know the man you working with properly… then you can see why he is innocent.
Q: Have you spoken to Schalk since then?
PDV: Come again?
Q: Have you spoken to Schalk since then?
PDV (with a smile and chuckling): Yes, definitely. We not cross with each other. We sat down at breakfast this morning too. We sat down last night until quarter past twelve waiting for them (the judiciary officers) to finish up inside. So ja, I spoke to him and as I expected, he is an honourable man. If you take him away from rugby, he will be the best person to have around you.
Q: So Burger denied any wrong doing?
PDV (long pause): I didn’t ask him if he denies he was wrong. I sat down, and I spoke to him… that’s what you asked me.
Q: When you look at the report, is there any chance you will appeal?
PDV (calmed down after the question was asked by a South African journalist): Again, I think we should just wait for the report to see what the wording is in there and then as a team – whatever decision we make – we’ll go all the way in clearing (stutters his words) his… his… his name. For us it will be the best thing to do.
Q: You say that Schalk is an honourable man and there is obviously a lot of emotion involved. Do you think that will win you the appeal?
PDV: What we must understand here very clearly is that rugby is a contact sport. And so is dancing. So guys (players and media) who can’t take it, must make the decision of their own. If you guys (the media) really sat through that entire game, you’ll find there were so many incidents (from the Lions players) that we could have gone and said: “We want to cite this guy for maliciously jumping into a guy’s face with his shoulder,” and stuff like that. Why didn’t we do it? The reason why we don’t to stuff like that, is because this game will always be a game to us and sometimes you get away with things that you don’t even mean. Sometimes you make decisions that are either right and wrong , and get away with it. We are so proud and honoured to be a part of it. If we are going to win games in boardrooms and in front of television cameras like this, then we should say to ourselves: “Do we really respect this game that we honour so much… and the passion for it? Do we want to be part of it?”. If you are going to complain about every incident we might as well go to a ballet shop and all get tutus and get a great dancing show on for all to see that has no eye-gouging, no tackling, no nothing and we can all in enjoy it! (It’s at this point when the media are looking around the room, wondering whether to laugh or take him seriously). But this game will have collisions, and the guy who wins that collision the hardest, that’s the guy we will always select. And if we are going to make it soft, because we won a Test series and people don’t like it… I can’t do anything about it.
Q: Peter, are you upset that the whole Burger incident has overshadowed what has been a historic series win over the Lions?
PDV: That is exactly how I feel. You know what, 29 years we’ve waited for this grrrreat occasion. 29 years! And we are going into the third Test with the series sealed. We are the winners of the British and Irish Lions series, and we are happy about it. This country can now rejoice and be positive for the next twelve years. So I would love the Lions supporters to honour the fact that we won this thing. It was tough and the hardest Test series I have seen in a long time. We came back from a a poor start and I never thought we would be able to do that, because this is a brilliant Lions team that we are up against. We are so… (at this point, De Villiers is interrupted by the same journalist that earlier asked if he was ‘ducking’ the questions)
PDV: Hey, don’t be so rude!
Journalist: Sorry, I wouldn’t dream of it.
PDV: Good. (Continues) What I would love for Lions supporters is to just stand up and take it on the chin and say: “Well done South Africa! Well done for what you’ve achieved in this series.” Just like we did in 1997.
Q: Has Lions coach Ian McGeechan congratulated you in person?
PDV: Well, nobody has really congratulated us up until now. But maybe they will do so after the third Test.
Q: Peter, congratulations on winning the series…
PDV: Thank you my man, you are the first one!
Q: Now that you’ve got the series in the bag, how are you going to approach the third Test?
PDV: We going to look at this Test, the same we have looked at all the others. We respect the Lions and they are still a good side. To bring the best of Europe over here is not a walk in the park. But remember, we are proud people too. We not going on to the field just receive payment, we take the field with pride. There’s a lot of people in wheelchairs that can’t play the game like we do., so we play the game for them. So we still have an obligation for our country and towards ourselves. So won’t go out there on Saturday just to give it away. It will be great if we can make it 3-0. But then again, we don’t have any control over winning and losing. But we can control how we want to play the game.
Q: There have been reports in the South African media that say you are the weak link in the Springbok team. How do you feel about that?
PDV: I’m not disappointed with them (the media). Everybody in life has an opinion. I don’t react to opinions, I react on fact. If people think I am the weakest link, then we are blady strong! I didn’t know about the perception, and I do not even have time to think about it. I know myself that I am a God-given talent. I am the best ever that I can be, so whatever you think about me doesn’t bother me. I know what I am, and I don’t give a damn.





June 30th, 2009 at 11:53 am
a) Does not condone fould play in any way.
b) Stands by Schalk because he did not do anything intentionally.
c) WWF wrestling is a contact, entertainment ‘sport’ with the sole purpose to entertain, but because it is full contact people have died doing it. Rugby is a full contact sport, in an extremely physical test match in collissions you will have hands and arms slipping around shoulders, necks and in the face, this does not mean it is intentional, it is just what comes part and parcel with the sport. If you are found guilty of this offence, you get punished, intentional or not. Fair enough.
d) Schalk got punished, fairly, PDV sticks by his player who obviously told him it was never intentional, and also, more than once, makes it clear they do not condone DELIBERATE FOUL PLAY but in rugby you can expect things like this to happen from time to time becuase after all, it is not dancing…
Now please, where is the #^%*@ problem?
June 30th, 2009 at 12:22 pm
bruDDerAnt
dont know if its gOOde for treFFik
but it will sure be great if we could always get the fuLL transcript posted here on RW
EspeciaLLy when its CoachDiv being interviewed!
For sure SARU must also make a transcript available of aLL ofFFicial interviews?
If they do not, then their communications dept should be:
1) geTTing a PK from the man himself- concuSSed or not;
2)be audited by SpiNNingWays and then be put to some remedial work by the samesaid “auditor”
3)or alternatively be told to buZZ oFF and replaced by diligent SARUSpiNNers.
June 30th, 2009 at 12:23 pm
Reply to nowoRRiesWiLLem :-)) @ 12:22 pm:
They won’t sell a newspaper in the world then Willem!
June 30th, 2009 at 12:25 pm
Reply to nowoRRiesWiLLem :-)) @ 12:22 pm:
coz then aLL the
okes and the
&
okes wont be able to
on :snor: aCCount!
June 30th, 2009 at 12:26 pm
Reply to Morné @ 12:23 pm:
Eish
Someone stiLL buys newspapers?
June 30th, 2009 at 12:32 pm
Reply to Morné @ 11:53 am:
Now please, where is the #^%*@ problem?
The problem is the media…. and the supporters that eagerly wait for snor to fail, like Harry Viljoen did due to media and supporters presure. Snor at least seem determine not to let the media and supporters get to him!
June 30th, 2009 at 12:37 pm
Reply to nowoRRiesWiLLem :-)) @ 12:26 pm:
Boertjie gaan jou nou bliksem, he loves newspapers!
My brother also buy it daily still.
Reply to Vloye @ 12:32 pm:
I think he thrives on it in fact.
June 30th, 2009 at 12:40 pm
Thanks Morne
Now WHY o, WHY did we have to wait soooooo long to get the real deal
As Willem said – looking forward to more truth and less spinnnnnnn from journos
June 30th, 2009 at 12:51 pm
hehehe the Snormeister has perfected the art of speaking without saying anything ………. :WTF: is probably the only thing everyone thinks when he has finished the presser
June 30th, 2009 at 1:01 pm
Reply to Morné @ 12:37 pm:
hehehe Oudste moet my EErs vang vOOr hy my kan moer!
BTW- I like newspapers as weLL- lot of uses once you have read the print.
Reply to The Brand @ 12:40 pm:
:thumbup:
Reply to Bongani @ 12:51 pm:
SnorMeister!
gOOdeone!
June 30th, 2009 at 1:02 pm
BTW Morne
Why dont you put up a thread
Once the Print is read- the 101 uses of the newspaper?
June 30th, 2009 at 1:05 pm
Damn, it makes sooo much more sense when you have the full story.
June 30th, 2009 at 1:12 pm
Reply to nowoRRiesWiLLem :-)) @ 1:02 pm:
I could, but then I dont buy newspapers so I would have no idea what they are used for, before or after!!!
June 30th, 2009 at 1:17 pm
Reply to Morné @ 1:12 pm:
understOOd
Just put up the thread and we can aDD
almost like a vrOOm vrOOOOm thread- just without the silicon!
June 30th, 2009 at 1:44 pm
Reply to nowoRRiesWiLLem :-)) @ 1:17 pm:
Its up.
June 30th, 2009 at 1:45 pm
Reply to nowoRRiesWiLLem :-)) @ 12:25 pm:
bwahahah!
I like!
June 30th, 2009 at 2:21 pm
you know, snor is growing on me
the constant bitching and moaning about the eyegouge here on mud island in the media is becoming sickening. i walk into a room full of poms and the first bloody thing is ‘dirty bloody saffas’ going to do some eye gouging of my own soon!
June 30th, 2009 at 3:17 pm
I am beginning to see the light. Sure it is garbled, irrational gobble-de-gook but it is filled with passion.
I understand why the media does not respond well to what he says. Most of it does not make any sense. They aim to wright articles filled with logic and constructed with good grammar. He gives them nothing they can use.
When it comes to the players it is different. What he says to them is less important than how he say it.
Jake White, the technical analyst, laid a good foundation. Most of the players got the why and the how and the when from him. They also get it from their S14 coaches.
What they get from PdV is right-brain stuff: emotion, passion, camaraderie, loyalty, sacrifice. The perfect guy to take a group of experienced players to the next level.
July 1st, 2009 at 4:02 pm
Sheeze what a difference the unspun transcript is. I truly can’t belive how the british … (and various SA journos) are twisting what was said to suite their needs.
Only thing that confused me for a bit is the walking off to the bushveld to go and eye-gouging a lion – had to read it a few times to realalise he’s talking about eye-gouging a real lion and then running like bloody crazy to get away, pretty funny actually
I can’t belive snor was made to appologise for this by SARU. They should have backed him in this case.
I’m not particularly a PDiv fan but I do think SA rugga fans should be vocally supporting him against these scavanging journalists and band wagon jumpers.
Regardles of our individual thoughts on this man he is the Bok coach and should be supported and when he gets dragged through the mud like this, so do all saffas.
July 1st, 2009 at 4:09 pm
Reply to Dremandred @ 4:02 pm:
HEHEHE
I had to read the lion bit a few times as well to get that he was talking about the genuine article. Don’t think the journo’s got it though.
Judging by you nick you are enjoying the Wheel of Time. Good series.
July 1st, 2009 at 4:15 pm
:thumbup:
Brilliant, alot to think about.
July 1st, 2009 at 5:21 pm
Reply to Ollie @ 4:09 pm:
Yip, name is intentionally misspelt to be a unique username
Well spotted.
July 1st, 2009 at 5:32 pm
Reply to Dremandred @ 4:02 pm:
Different opinions.
IMO he is crawling through
the mud himself, not being
dragged.
No journo will protect a public
figure against his own stupidities.
July 1st, 2009 at 8:41 pm
Reply to Boertjie @ 5:32 pm:
Spoken like a true journo….