Saturday nightâs loss by the Wallabies, kids, was the reason we do all the boring and tedious drills at training each week. The simple fact of the matter is that if you canât do the little things well, the âone-percentersâ as we call them, champion teams will towel you up.
Brett McKay, The Roar
Saturday night is why we work on our tackling techniques, why we perfect our re-starts, why we do passing drills longer than we probably need to, and why we practice our work at the breakdown.
The whole point of these drills is that with repetition, these skills â these little things â become second nature; they become instinctive. When you donât have to think about the little things, you can play on instinct, and when you play on instinct, thatâs what wins you big matches.
The Wallabies, kids, copped a lesson in why the little things are so important in rugby.
Just consider these sample tid-bits from Saturday night, just a quick flick through where the Wallabies let themselves and their coaches down by failing in the one percenters:
⢠After seeing Dan Carter have a clearing kick charged down for the first try of the match, Matt Giteau on-passed to Berrick Barnes, who then had to kick under pressure into three defenders, and Carter himself was able to snare a charge-down try. Giteau was already inside his own 22, and had more time and space than did Barnes. Why wouldnât he just kick himself?
⢠After Owen Franks was penalised and yellow-carded for a massive shoulder-first tackle on Richard Brown, the Wallabies inexcusably failed to find touch with their kick.
⢠The Wallabies shortly afterwards then gave up their numbers advantage when Drew Mitchell was penalised and yellow-carded for the same offence.
⢠Will Genia at one point gave away a short-arm penalty from the scrum for failing to feed the ball when directed.
⢠Mitchell knocked the ball out of Conrad Smithâs hands as he was shaping for the quick lineout throw, and in full view of referee Craig Joubert. Joubert had warned both captains before half time that he would have no hesitation in issuing cards for players who deliberately knocked the ball away in quick tap situations.
Joubert proved he wasnât bluffing, and confirmed Mitchellâs stupidity, by issuing the yellow as warned. Except, Drew, you already copped a yellow card in the first half, and so the promised yellow in this situation became a red card for you, didnât it, and the Wallabies would play the last 36 minutes of the game with 14 men.
And you can probably thank your lucky stars the judiciary left it at that.
⢠Mils Muliaina crosses out wide for his second try, but unforgivably, was allowed to run around closer to the posts before grounding the ball.
⢠From All Black re-starts, the Wallabies regularly failed to contest the ball, and Kieran Read was able to run through and win the ball for fun. At which point would you expect that situation might be rectified: the first, fourth, or tenth time?
⢠Barnes kicked ahead in one attacking phase, but without telling replacement winger Kurtley Beale. The ball may as well have been just given to the All Blacks, for all the kick and no-chase achieved.
⢠Richard Brown, after an Australian scrum win, went without the ball and the All Blacksâ loose forwards were left to pick up the ball with âI canât believe he just did thatâ looks on their faces.
And they were just the things that came to me as I started typing. Iâm sure there were plenty of other âlittle thingsâ that Iâve left out.
No team, at any level of competition, can make silly little mistakes like these ones and expect to be competitive in a match. When that match doubles as the first Bledisloe Cup clash of the season, it was only through the good grace of a few wayward Carter shots at goal that didnât have the Wallabies staring down the barrel of a record loss.
Whatâs worse is that the Wallabies barely resembled the side that so clinically put South Africa away the week before in Brisbane. They were wearing the same colours, and David Pocock will most deservedly get the playerâs player votes again â and by some margin, Iâd suggest â but they didnât look like the Wallabies weâd just fallen back in love with.
Only late last week on The Roar, I made a comment on the real challenge facing the Wallabies going into this match, saying, âthatâs the thing about consistency, youâve got to do it all the time.â
All of a sudden, itâs like 2009 and itâs dĂŠjĂ vu all over again. Melbourne is the new Wellington.
Return clash
So exactly how do the Wallabies turn this display around in time for the return clash in Christchurch this week?
Well, I expect theyâll be being âstrongly encouragedâ (because I suppose beatings arenât cool any more) that they have to offer more than just on-off runners in attack, and likewise, theyâll be âhaving their memories joggedâ of the importance of effective tackling.
Theyâll be made to sit through endless replays of both rucks that David Pocock didnât contest, and then theyâll be âsubtly remindedâ that as good as this guy is already, he canât do everything on his own at the breakdown (although he did go a long way to proving that perhaps he can).
The Wallabies proved in Brisbane that doing the little things well allows them to play the way they want to (and the way we want to see). They proved that when on song, theyâre as good a team as you could hope for.
After Melbourne, and after a good old-fashioned training track flogging, letâs just hope theyâve now heeded the lesson of the little things.





August 4th, 2010 at 11:36 am
I never bother reading past an author’s ‘kids’ address in an article, review or what not!
August 4th, 2010 at 12:28 pm
Reply to bryce_in_oz @ 11:36 am:
OK oupa.
August 4th, 2010 at 1:01 pm
Reply to Boertjie @ 12:28 pm:
Lol… it’s one of my pet irks…