Home Carrot Ratings Boks Carrot Ratings – From a high to a low in 8...

Boks Carrot Ratings – From a high to a low in 8 minutes

13
SHARE

It is bitterly disappointed to loose a test like this when you so far ahead with minutes to play.

It is one of those that could have and should have been but was not.

With the Springboks dominating play on the scoreboard and with the stats with 10 minutes to go, it should have been a double for them against the All Blacks.

Here is the highlights of the test

Here is how we saw the players in this test…

15. Willie Le Roux (9)

In his 50th test for the Springboks Le Roux has shown yet again we do not have any better in the number fifteen jumper. What makes him so great is his reading of the game and his pin point passing and decision making. Should have been rewarded with a win. Went off at a crucial time for concussion test.

healthman

healthman

healthmanhealthman

healthman

healthman

 

 

14 Cheslin Kolbe – (5)

Kolbe scored an important try for the Boks and stood up in defence but was quit for the rest of it all.

healthman

healthmanhealthman

 

 

 

13.Jesse Kriel (7)

Had one of his best test for the Boks, was brilliant in the try he scored and won the midfield battle hands down.

healthmanhealthmanhealthman

healthmanhealthman

 

 

12.Damian de Allende: (6)

Same as Kriel winning the battle against Williams and Crotty on the night and ran the perfect line from a Kolisi offload. Can do more on creating space but suspect he was playing according to coach plan.

healthman

healthman

healthmanhealthman

 

 

11. Aphiwe Dyantyi (5)

He was a marked man and made a few mistakes under pressure. Did not get many chances from his midfield to show his class.

healthman

healthmanhealthman

 

 

10. Handre Pollard (7)

Thought Handre had a good game, when he was the first receiver he got over the advantage line. We need Handre more as first receiver to get him in his natural game. Kicking game has improve a hell of a lot and kicking to poles brilliant again.

healthmanhealthmanhealthmanhealthmanhealthman

 

 

9. Faf de Klerk(9)

Pick up one mistake in the whole game, was all over Smith again and won the battle hands down. His tactical kicking was brilliant on the night and injury force substitution hurt the Boks at the end.

healthman

healthmanhealthmanhealthmanhealthmanhealthman

 

 

8. Francois Louw (6)

Came back in the Boks team this week and had a solid game but did not give us that extra bit we needed.

healthmanhealthman

healthmanhealthman

 

 

7. Pieter-Steph du Toit: (8)

Another pure heart performance from the big man smashing the  All Blacks back at times although big spill on halftime…and giving a crucial penalty away at the end that led to a All Black try

healthman

healthmanhealthmanhealthmanhealthmanhealthman

 

 

6.Siya Kolis(5)

Had a hard working game but again pop too many times up in the backline just to make some poor decisions on attack. Had strong runs and missed a few tackle as well.

healthmanhealthman

healthman

 

 

5. Franco Mostert: (6)

Had a really quit game at his own standards. Was not as prominent but we all know he does the hard work in the dark places

healthmanhealthmanhealthmanhealthman

 

 

4. Eben Etzebeth(6)

Another strong game from the big man, made some great runs with ball in hand and stole a few at lineout time. Did give away a few penalties

healthmanhealthmanhealthmanhealthman

 

 

 

3. Frans Malherbe (5)

Was ok in the scrums and did not really did much more, still do not believe he is the best we have at number 3

healthmanhealthmanhealthman

 

 

2.Malcolm Marx (8)

Just a class player all over the field and were great in the scrums and lineouts. He was again a monster on the ground with a few steals and manage to slow down the All Blacks ball.

healthman

healthmanhealthmanhealthman

healthman

 

 

Steven Kitshoff: (6)

Not the normal huge impact we expect from the big man. He scrummed well and was on hand with supporting runs and defended well again.

healthmanhealthmanhealthmanhealthman

 

 

Man of the Match

Was a very close call between Willie and Faf so I am giving it to them both.

Willie deserve it not just because it was his 50th test but because he was again the force in the backline for the Springboks.

He is not just the brains in the attacking system but has also been the force on attack for the Springboks this year…..

A lot was said after the match about the subs Erasmus made at the end, here is his explanation on these subs at a crucial stage of the test….

Springbok coach Rassie Erasmus says Willie le Roux and Faf de Klerk’s substitutions in the loss to the All Blacks were injury-enforced.

Erasmus explained that his hand was forced with regards to the changes at fullback and scrumhalf. Damian Willemse replaced Le Roux while Embrose Papier came on for De Klerk.

‘Why did I make the substitutions? Because people have been asking me to give the other guys [such as Willemse and Papier] a chance,’ the Bok coach joked, before relaying his reasons.

‘Willie got a concussion and failed his HIA. Faf was cramping. So that was two swaps at the same time, with two big decision-makers coming off.

Facebook Comments

Facebook Comments

13 COMMENTS

  1. Pretty fair reflection… but the bench even though only a few minutes should have been mentioned. That was the difference alongside the poor captaining and coach who selected them and made the costly subs.

    One can’t help but feel that if Whiteley was wearing the captain’s armband for the last 20, like Wellington… it could have made the difference.

    This game reminded me of a few in NZ during JW’s tenure… carrying certain players on the bench meant he could just not get that full 23 man 85min game he needed for all those last minute losses.

  2. But why take De Allende off and swap a strong tackler with Jantjes? And why send Papier on – when he has not played any decent rugby for the last 2 months BECAUSE YOU DID NOT USE HIM. sorry Rassie, this is on you – and some players need to realise that the team cannot carry them every game.

  3. Ah the blatant racism still flying thick and fast, going to have to attend to that.

  4. @Provincejoulekkading:

    Ah yes I see the ‘ever-the-victim-syndrome’ is still flying thick and fast…

    Care to point out the ‘blatant’ racism above that clearly only ‘you’ can see? Care to point out how ‘you’ are going to ‘attend to that’?

    Piss weak!

  5. ”Care to point out how ‘you’ are going to ‘attend to that’?”

    What a joke… yep I’ve spotted it… you’ve jumped in and taken away my posting rights… Mr Piss Weak.

    The same postings that have included the likes of ‘real’ Ben Smith analysis, not to mention you failed to notice in the last 4 weeks the increased SEO Alexa/Google Rank traffic I smashed through this site using ‘real’ SEO techniques to send some international flavour into it.

    Well done mate… give your ‘ever-the-victim’ self an upper-cut!

    And Bunny… well done to you… you now clearly have the vacuous, echo-chambered, ‘Ja-Broer’ site you want… I’m done…

  6. @Aldo: Haha – you will wait forever! I guess it relates to “you are not allowed to criticize anybody of colour by law – as it will either be (1) racist (if you are white) or (2) you are a coconut and DA agent – we will burn down your house, you piece of shit! (if you are not white)”

  7. The remark was deleted.. Guys be very careful you all know the laws of the land and we are working in that guidelines.

    Hate speech, racism nor defamation of a persons character are not allowed as per the constitution, it will be not be tolerated which has been always the case at Ruggaworld.

    Also make sure we do not make it personal, we can go at each other but there is a limit.

    It is that simple.

Comments are closed.